ShouldProfit-SeekingFakeGoodsBuyersBeEn.."/>
人人書

雜誌

保存到桌面 | 簡體人人書 | 手機版
傳記回憶文學理論偵探推理驚悚懸疑詩歌戲曲雜文隨筆小故事書評雜誌
人人書 > 雜誌 > Pros & Cons

Pros & Cons

時間:2024-10-26 10:00:25


    ShouldProfit-SeekingFakeGoodsBuyersBeEncouraged?

TomarkWorldConsumerRightsDayeveryyear,ChinaroutinelyexposesfraudulenttransactionsandbusinessmalpracticesonMarch15.Thisyear,thespotlightwasonpeoplewhoknowinglypurchasefakegoodssothattheycanmakeakillingbyseekingcompensation.

Thisphenomenonhasbecomeanindustrybyitself,withahistoryofovertwodecades.Thetrendstartedin1995whenabuyer,WangHai,soughttopurchasetwoheadsetsatashoppingmallinBeijing.Wangrealizedtheywerecounterfeitsbutstillwentaheadandboughtanother10.HethenmanagedtogetdoublewhathepaidfromtheshoppingmallundertheConsumerRightsProtectionLaw.

TodayWangownsfourcompaniesinBeijing,Tianjin,NanjingandShenzhen,allofthemspecializinginturningaprofitbyextractingcompensationfromsellersofcounterfeitgoods.In2014,thecompaniesmadeaprofitofover4millionyuan($617,000).The鈥渋ndustry鈥漬owhasalargenumberofpeopleworkingtounearthcounterfeitproductssothattheycanclaimcompensationandmakeaneatprofit.

Thoughtheyexposethefraudulentpracticesofsomeindustrygiants,thegroup,however,isalsoaccusedofblackmailingbusinesses.Publicopinionontheseprofit-driven鈥渃onsumerrightsactivists鈥漣sdivided.Theirsupporterssaytheyhavetheprofessionalknowledgeandexperienceneededtoobtaincompensationforfakegoods,therebysafeguardingconsumers鈥檙ightsandkeepingthemarketinorder.

ButtheircriticssaythegovernmentshouldbantheseprofessionalswhoaremisusingtheConsumerRightsProtectionLawforfinancialgains.Whattheydogoesagainsttheprinciplesofintegrityandhonesty.Tradeunionsandnonprofitorganizationsarethemoreappropriateentitiestohelpprotectconsumers鈥檙ights.

Pro
    LongMinfeiguancha.gmw.cn

Profit-seekingfakegoodsinvestigatorsarenotperfectbuttheydeserveourunderstandingandsupportaswecanlearnsomethingabouthowtoprotectourlegalrightsasconsumers.Woodpeckerseatinsectsthatareharmfultotreesnottoprotecttheforestbuttosurvivethemselves.Butthatdoesn鈥檛stoppeoplefrompraisingthebirds.Similarly,weshouldnotbetoocriticalofpeoplewholiveonpurchasingfakegoodsandthenclaimcompensationastheoutcomeoftheirworkactuallybenefitsoursociety.

ThenewlyamendedConsumerRightsProtectionLawhasincreasedthecompensationamountsubstantially,meaningalargerprofitforthesepeople.Itislikelythatmoreandmorepeoplewillworkinthistrade.Ithinkitisagoodthing.

Thereisstillalongwaytogobeforeeveryconsumerbecomesawareofhis/herlegalrightswhentheygetintodisputes.Underthiscircumstance,oursocietyneedstheseprofit-seekingconsumerrightsadvocates.However,wecannotdependonthemsolely.Thegovernmentshouldmakegreatereffortstorootoutcounterfeitgoods.Whenwholesocietyworksunitedly,harmfulbusinessesproducingorsellingfakeproductswouldbefullyexposedanderadicated.CA

Con
    ZhuYonghuawww.youth.cn

Theseprofit-seekingfakegoodsinvestigatorsacquirefinancialcompensationbysettingtrapsandusingskillfultactics.AsWangHai,whostartedthebusinessinChina,said,thefightagainstcounterfeitproductshasnothingtodowithjustice.Itisagoodactonlybecauseyoucanmakemoney.

Obviously,thisgroupofpeopleistakingadvantageoftheConsumerRightsProtectionLawtoforcefakegoodsmanufacturersandsellerstopaythem.Businesseswillevenbribetheso-calledconsumeractiviststocutthemsomeslack.Besides,theseinvestigatorsgochasingafteranothertargetassoonastheygetcompensationfromone,oblivioustowhetherthemanufacturerorsellerisstillcontinuingwithillegalactivities.

Inmyopinion,theconductofprofit-seekingfakegoodsinvestigatorsgoesagainstboththemodernvaluesoursocietyadvocatesandthetraditionalvaluesournationhaslongheld.Purchasingproductsthatyouknowarefakeandthenclaimingcompensationasavictimisnotanobleordignifieddeed.Admittedly,cheatingconsumersbymanufacturingorsellingfakegoodsisagainstthelaw.Butweshouldnotsupportoradvocatetheseso-calledconsumeractivists鈥檞ayof鈥減rotecting鈥漜onsumers鈥檒egalrights.

Whattheprofit-seekinginvestigatorsdoisfundamentallydifferentfromthegovernment鈥檚effortstocrackdownonfakegoods.Wecannotregarditasasupplementasitwillnotbringanypositiveresultsbutwillonlyunderminethegovernment鈥檚authority.Toleratingsuchpeoplewilljeopardizethevaluesystemofintegrityandhonesty.CA

Pro
    ZuChangyunMediacommentator

Somepeoplesaythatthesefakegoodsinvestigatorsareprofitdrivenortrytoblackmailsellersormanufacturersafterbuyinggoodstheyknowtobefake.Butwecannotdenythatwhattheydoindeeddetersmanufacturersandsellersfromproducingorsellingfakegoods.Theirworkalsohelpsincreaseordinarycon-sumers鈥檃warenessoftheirlegalrights.

Peoplewholiveonpurchasingcounterfeitgoodsandgoingafterthemanufacturersandsellersforcompensationarecomplementingthegovernment鈥檚effortsincrackingdownonmanufacturingandsellingoffakegoods.Nomatterwhatintentionstheyhave,theireffortshelpregulatethemarket.Aslongastheyconducttheirbusinesswithintheframeworkofthelaw,weshouldsupportthemfortheoutcometheireffortsproduce.CA

Con
    FanJun

www.southcn
    SinceWangHaibecameChina鈥檚firstprofit-seekingfakegoodsinvestigatorin1995,moreandmorepeoplehavejoinedthebusiness.Thereasonisthatthisisaprofitablebusinessintheireyes.

Themotiveoftheseso-calledconsumeractivistsistomakeaprofit.Thisisevidentfromtheirgeneralpracticeoftryingtoprivatelysettledisputeswithsellersormanufacturersoffakegoodsbeforefilinglawsuits.Somepeoplecallthemparasiteswhothriveonillegalcommercialactivities.Theirprofit-drivenmotiveisobviousinspiteoftheirseeminglyrightfulexplanationthattheyarelookingforjustice.

Spurredbyself-interest,people鈥檚greedwillbecomeunrestrained.Consumers鈥檃warenessofprotectingtheirrightsthroughlegalmeansisincreasingtodayandthechannelstodosoarealsogettingsmoother.Therefore,profit-seekingfakegoodsinvestigatorsarenotnecessaryanymore.Besides,thegovernmentagenciesinchargeshoulddealwithconsumers鈥檆omplaintsandcrackdownoncounterfeitgoodsmoreeffectivelysothatthemarketisshipshape.Inthisway,profit-seekingfakegoodsinvestigatorswillnolongerbeabletoprofitfromfakegoods.CA

Pro
    JiangYongxingJinhuaDaily

Investigatingfakegoodsandgoingaftertheirsellersforcompensationrequiresprofessionalknowledgeandexperiencewhichnoteverybodypossesses.Nowadays,counterfeitgoodsaresowellmadethatordinaryconsumerscannotmakeouttheyarefakes.Ifpeoplewhounwittinglyboughtfakeproductswanttoexercisetheirrightsasconsumers,theyhavetoknowtheconsumers鈥檙ightslaw.Inaddition,theyhavetobeprepared,bothphysicallyandmentally,toembarkonatime-andenergy-consumingchallengeofnegotiatingwiththepartiesinvolved-sell-ers,manufacturesandevengovernmentagencies鈥搕owincompensation.Itisverydifficultforanordinaryconsumertoachievethis.

Ordinaryconsumersresorttoclaimingcompensationonlywhentheirindividualrightsareinfringedon.Butprofit-seekingfakegoodsinvestigators鈥檅usinessistocrackdownonspuriousgoods.Theytaketheinitiativetolearnwaysandresearchtoimprovewhattheydoforbetterresults.Althoughtheyareprofit-driven,theireffortshelpcleansethemarketoffakegoodsandbenefittheconsumer.CA

Con
    ZhangXiliuguancha.gmw.cn

Weshouldnotoverestimatetheeffectivenessofwhattheso-calledconsumerrightsadvocatesdo.

Thisgroupofpeoplebuygoodsthattheyknowarecounterfeitjustforfinancialgains.Thisisatwistedmindsetandshouldnotbeacceptedasitoverridestheoriginalreasonbehindclaimingcompensation:upholdingjustice.

Establishingfirmstorunthisbusinessasanindustryfurtherexposesthesepeople鈥檚selfishnessandprofit-drivenmotives.Thesecompaniesarejustmakingaprofitunderthedisguiseofworkingasactivists.Onceclaimingcompensationbecomesabusiness,thoseso-calledactivistswilltrytomakefinancialgainsbyhookorbycrook.Intheprocess,theywillinevitablyjeopardizethemarketorderandcausemorecomplicateddisputesandsocialconflicts.

Therampantgrowthofprofit-seekingfakegoodsinvestigationindustryshowsthatnon-profitorganizationsdidn鈥檛playtheirdueroleinsafeguardingconsumers鈥檒egalrights.Insteadofencouragingtheseso-calledconsumerrightsadvocates,non-profitorganizationsshouldassumetheirdueresponsibilityinthisregard.CA
   

熱門書籍

熱門文章